If a
picture is worth a thousand words, than Frank
Leslie’s Illustrated Newspaper (Frank
Leslie’s) told millions of stories in the latter half of the nineteenth
century. In Beyond the Lines: Pictorial Reporting, Everyday Life, and the Crisis of
Gilded Age America, Joshua Brown explores the images produced by Frank Leslie’s and the manner in which
they were constituted “by a complicated social negotiation among artists,
editors, engravers, and readers.”
Brown’s careful analysis of these images, set in the context of the
times in which they were produced, provides a glimpse into the changing face of
America from the founding of Frank
Leslie’s in 1855 to its eventual sale by the Leslie family in 1889.
Frank
Leslie’s began publication in the turbulent years leading up to the
American Civil War. In exploring the
first decade of the newspaper’s existence, Brown focuses on both the technology
involved in the publication as well as on the stories covered by Frank Leslie’s. From the entry of Frank Leslie’s onto the publishing scene, technological
advancements paved the way for the newspaper’s success. The transition from rag to wood pulp paper
and the invention of the steam printing press lowered costs, making newspapers
more affordable for a general public that was simultaneously becoming more
literate. At the same time, advances in
communication, such as the spread of the telegraph and the completion of the
transatlantic cable, provided quicker access to news from around the nation and
the wider world. With this new
technology, Frank Leslie’s published
its illustrations and accompanying narrative at a time when the United States
was enduring the political turmoil that would see the nation first ripped apart
and then awkwardly reconciled. In these
initial years of publication, Brown demonstrates that Frank Leslie’s walked a fine line amongst its readers, striving to
meet the needs of both its Northern and Southern audiences. In addition to its coverage of national
politics, the newspaper stepped cautiously into reform movements, achieving its
greatest success in its coverage of the “swill milk” campaign of 1858-1859.
The work of this first decade set
the tone for the post-bellum publication of Frank
Leslie’s, even as it meant that much of the content of the newspaper and
its illustrations would necessarily change.
Technological advancements in engraving and continued improvements in both
the publishing and communication industries kept Frank Leslie’s affordable and available to its audiences. But, just as Frank Leslie’s had walked the line between Northern and Southern
sentiment before the War, it once again found itself struggling to meet the
needs of its diverse readers in the post-bellum nation. As Brown so ably illustrates, the face of
America after the Civil War was changing—and Frank Leslie’s changed with it.
New faces appeared on its pages, the faces of labor, of immigration, of
newly freed blacks, and of women. To
keep a readership large enough to sustain production and provide a profit, Frank Leslie’s had to portray these
faces in a myriad of ways that would not alienate any large block of its
readers.
To
accomplish this goal, the engravers and editors at Frank Leslie’s engaged in a
system of “social typing,” demonstrating with illustration both the
characteristics of certain groups of people and the situations and locales in
which these people may be found. And
here, as Brown demonstrates time and again, Frank
Leslie’s shifted from view to view, from perspective to perspective, all in
a manner designed to maintain its readership.
One example of this can be found in Frank
Leslie’s treatment of freed blacks in
the South. Certainly, as Brown notes, Frank Leslie’s showed African Americans through a “limited range of types
whose energy or indolence was founded on their putative innate, childlike
qualities.” At the same time, however,
the portrayals of Exodusters migrating to Kansas were characterized by
“ambition and dignity.” Through its
coverage, Frank Leslie’s provided
images of blacks as both victims and perpetrators of violence, as both the
unwitting dupes of the Republican Party and as an engaged and enthusiastic
polity, as lazy and indolent and as hardworking and ambitious. This same complexity and ongoing change in
imagery can be found in Frank Leslie’s portrayals of women, of immigrants
(particularly the Irish, who went from “thugs” to the face of the yeomanry),
and those involved in the labor movement.
Throughout Beyond the Lines,
Brown shows time and again that what one may call inconsistency in Frank Leslie’s images and editorial
stand was actually a continuing process of renegotiation and reinvention of
social types, as the newspaper sought to maintain its hold on its readers.
Most reviewers seem to agree with
Bruce R. Kahler of Bethany College in Kansas, who found that “Brown is at his
best when he closely examines the evolving visual strategies employed by Frank Leslies.” While Kahler finds fault with Brown’s work
overall, noting that it “adds little to our understanding of nineteenth-century
American society,” other reviewers, like Helen Damon-Moore of Cornell, praise
Brown’s work as, in Damon-Moore’s words, “an intelligent, engaging and
significant contribution…to the social history of the Gilded Age.” Of course, reviewers were nearly unanimous in
their approval of the lavish use of images in Beyond the Lines, not surprising in a book about the illustrated
press.
What perhaps could have enhanced
Brown’s analysis of the social history of the Gilded Age would have been a
closer look at the intersection between fact and fiction that seems inherent in
the engraved illustrations as used by Frank
Leslie’s. Louie S. Warren explores
this topic at length in his Buffalo
Bill’s America: William Cody and The Wild West Show. Warren demonstrates that his subject rose to
national prominence as the result of a powerful combination of fact and
fiction, of Cody’s “method of promoting his real achievements” by mingling them
“with colorful fictions,” all with an eye toward producing a likeness and story
that would enchant audiences and gain their willingness to purchase the
product. A similar case can be made for
the illustrations in Frank Leslie’s. These images, as noted by Brown, arose from a
combination of the biases, viewpoints, prejudices, and concerns of artists,
reporters, and editors, all seeking to craft the images in such a way as to
maintain readership for the newspaper.
While Brown may argue for the greater authenticity contained within an
engraved illustration by noting that “wood engravings presented readers with
pictorial narratives of events” that served as “dramatic and detailed diagrams”
of the events of the day, this is not enough.
For Buffalo Bill as for the images in Frank Leslie’s, the needs and desires of the audience determined in
large measure the way the illusion of truth and accuracy were crafted.
In Beyond the
Lines, Joshua Brown has penned an insightful and penetrating glimpse into
the importance of the illustrated press in capturing the places and faces of
Gilded Age America. Brown does leave his
audience wanting more—a comparison with the imagery used in dime novels, perhaps,
or an explanation of why the Chinese received such favorable treatment in the
pages of Frank Leslie’s—but this
merely serves to whet the appetite. The
mixture of social and cultural history by Brown is a heady one, not unlike the
mixture of fact and fiction at the heart of the Gilded Age. Readers will want more of the same.
Brown, Joshua. Beyond the Lines: Pictorial Reporting,
Everyday Life, and the Crisis of Gilded Age America. Berkeley: University of California Press,
2002.
Damon-Moore, Helen. Review of Beyond
the Lines: Pictorial Reporting, Everyday Life, and the Crisis of Gilded Age
America by Joshua Brown. The American Historical Review 108, No.
3 (June 2003), pp. 846-847.
Kahler, Bruce R.
Review of Beyond the Lines:
Pictorial Reporting, Everyday Life, and the Crisis of Gilded Age America by
Joshua Brown. American Studies, Vol. 44, No. 3 (Fall 2003), pp. 161-162.
Warren, Louis S.
Buffalo Bill’s America: William
Cody and the Wild West Show. New
York: Vintage Books, 2005.
No comments:
Post a Comment